Showing posts with label Rob Letterman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rob Letterman. Show all posts

Thursday, January 5, 2012

An Urban Comedy Under The Sea: Shark Tale


The Good: I'm stretching here, so I'll say "moments of humor"
The Bad: Unimpressive Animation, Obvious overused story, one-dimensional characters, just dumb
The Basics: Shark Tale should be avoided for its gross racism and sexism that attempts to fly by as "family fare."


Some time ago, it became part of popular culture to refer to all things "black" as "urban." That is to say, when people want to use a polite euphemism for "black," they say "urban." Thus, it became something strangely appropriate to talk about the language of "urban music" as opposed to saying "man, people swear a lot in that newfangled black music." Or we started to talk about "urban crime" instead of "black on black crime." Sometimes, things are just plain ridiculous.

I preface this review this way because within five minutes of beginning Shark Tale, it became obvious to me that I was watching the same "urban comedy" I've seen before. I've seen such jokes and character types in such bla . . , er, "urban" movies as Barbershop and . . . well, others that aren't coming immediately to mind. All I know is that within a few minutes of watching the protagonist in Shark Tale, I felt that someone at Dreamworks, at some meeting somewhere, said "we need to do something to bring in more money. We need to target a new audience. What audience haven't we exploited yet?" "Well, there's a black audience we've neglected." "Phil! It's 'urban!' But good idea. We could make an urban film and use all sorts of urban actors to flesh out our world. Who's the most popular urban actor of our time?" "Well, there's Denzel . . ." "What about that Fresh Prince guy? He's kind of urban?" "Yeah, he's wildly popular! Call Will Smith! We'll need a good urban actress to star along side him. Who could that be?" "Well, how about Angela Bassett? Or Vivica A. Fox?" "No, Phil, we need someone even more Urban, you know with a capital B, er, U." "How about Renee Zellweger and Angelina Jolie?" "Well, they're pretty whi . . . er, suburban, but at least they'll let us draw them as fish." "Yeah, Jolie might even complain that we made her lips too small . . ." "Shut up, Phil."

All humor aside (and if that amused even one of you, it's more than Shark Tale would do), Shark Tale is a pretty pathetic and transparent tale of Black America set under the sea. The saddest part of this incorporation is that it lacks all of the genuine social commentary that could set it apart from a decent satire or an original urban comedy. Instead, in attempting to be a "family friendly" movie, Shark Tale incorporates and reinforces much of the worst stereotypes in American Ethnic relations today.

Enter Oscar, your slacker-type, minimum wage stereotype. He is the type of lazy fish that Conservatives like to characterize all urban fish as. He is a barely-working grunt, showing up late to his job at the Whale Wash. Like other urban fish, he has maxed out his credit to loan sharks and bookies on ridiculous get-rich-quick schemes because, as any Conservative will tell you, those urban fish can't be trusted to use credit responsibly. And they're always dreaming of something better. I wonder why they do that? Oscar, being a male urban fish, is completely oblivious to the affections of Angie, another urban fish working at the Whale Wash in an administrative capacity.

The Reef, the urban area where Oscar, Angie and others live, is plagued by sharks, who in this incarnation take the stereotypical role of the Italian-descended Americans. Naturally, then, the sharks are all into organized crime, led by Don Lino, who is trying to teach his pacifistic shark son Lenny how to be ruthless enough to run the racket on the Reef. When the Don's other (more vicious) son is killed in an accident while chasing Oscar, Oscar and Lenny become buddies (in a real Eddie Murphy/Judge Rienhold way). Oscar becomes the celebrity of the Reef, Lenny gets to go into hiding and Don Lino, believing his sons have been killed, goes off with murderous rage as we all know sharks are inclined to do.

Okay, first off, the positive. I laughed once during the movie. I don't remember even what the joke was. But there was a laugh involved. And it didn't come when the vaguely homophobic reference to Lenny as a dolphin was made (hey, if the movie is going to be pretty transparently anti-Italian and anti-Bl . . . urban, why not throw in a few anti-gay pokes, too?). I laughed once.

Beyond that, there's nothing impressive about Shark Tale. Indeed, just the opposite, this is an unremarkable movie. From the outset, the animation is nowhere near as impressive as previous Pixar or Disney-Pixar movies. In their new thrust to churn out some computer-generated animated fodder at least once a year, Pixar has lost its magic for detail. In Monsters, Inc., there was a real treat seeing the film on the big screen for the impressive details. At least on the big screen, the viewer could marvel at how distinct every one of Sully's hairs were. Shark Tale lacks that level of animation detail.

Shark Tale is also disappointingly humorless. It is hard to see how even a child would find Shark Tale funny. I suppose another reason for making a "children's movie" with an "urban flavor" is that a lot of music, fashion and popular culture is taking more from popular urban culture. Little children of all ethnicities have baggy jeans and basketball jerseys and know what "bling-bling" is (though the origins of the latter term, as a poignant moment on The Wayne Brady Show illustrated, has its origins in the early portions of the previous century's monied classes). Perhaps even whites do not get off scot-free in this movie if the slow, rich whales are the metaphor for caucasians.

But there is something to the argument that Shark Tale is perpetrating dangerous stereotypes under the guise of the same old stupid "rags to riches" story. I was concerned that perhaps I was putting forward an argument that was not necessarily there, but the more I consider this movie, the more disturbing and dangerous I think it may be. Just about every subculture portrayed in Shark Tale is from a minority (save women) and none is portrayed positively. Here, in frank language, is how Shark Tale pervades and reinforces terrible ideas about how people who aren't white live:

Black Americans - characterized, or caricatured, by Oscar (voiced by Will Smith) are portrayed as lazy, poor, and not terribly cunning. Oscar is an opportunist who lies, is caught in his lie, lies some more, comes up with a crazy scheme to continue perpetrating his lies, until he is put in a situation where he is in danger and he folds like a cheap card table. And at the end of the character's journey from rags to riches, he is put back in his place, servicing the whales. The difference between Oscar at the beginning of the movie and at the end is that at the beginning he has real dreams for advancement and riches and living in the skyrise, and at the end, finding himself back at the Whale Wash as the new owner of the facility, he finds that he can dream, but only so far. In the greatest work of American Literature (my obviously unbiased opinion), Invisible Man (reviewed here!), Ellison writes the line of the Black Predicament in the business world, "Please hope him to death, and keep him running." The idea there is that the key to controlling the oppressed minorities (especially true of the economically disadvantaged) is to give them hope, but no real hope for progress. Shark Tale reinvents this idea that Ellison wrote about in 1947 through Oscar by dashing Oscar's dreams, but leaving him positive about where he is left. So, Oscar goes from the bottom of the sea, to the top of the Reef and ends up back at the bottom of the reef, but feels better about it because now he has slightly more of a stake in it. If the trend held, any Shark Tale sequel would have to, by necessity, begin with Oscar near to losing the Whale Wash (probably through his irresponsibility) and then ending with him reclaiming the small business. Shark Tale illustrates how complacent the masses of poor and predominantly Black Americans may be kept in their place by simply turning their dreams of equality into minority partners in the worst possible businesses in America. And that suits such ill-educated and lazy people anyway, if Shark Tale is any indication.

Women - fare no better in Shark Tale as characterized by three personas: Angie, Lola, and Katie Current. Angie (Zellweger) is intelligent but refuses to express herself. Indeed, she is characterized as demure, subservient (or at the very least deferential) to Oscar in all things and lacking in confidence in her own abilities and beauty. She has a crush on Oscar, wants to help him out, but only expresses her true love for him through violent, irrational outbursts when she has pushed him away. Moreover, her affections for Oscar compel her to remain silent when she learns of his duplicities rather than exposing him. Men, rejoice! Women won't turn you in if you pay them lip service from time to time. Show them the least amount of affection and they'll trail you like puppies. Except, that is, for the type like Lola (Angelina Jolie). Lola is a golddigger type explicitly (through music) characterized as a woman who is only after money. Of course, an urban fish like Oscar just sees good tail and will go after it, never thinking of the consequences. And then there's the annoying cameos by Katie Currant (Katie Couric), who is pushy and invasive as the lead reporter on the Reef. If her real shows are like the parody here, one wonders who watches her shows. So, to clarify, women in Shark Tale are either deferential, spineless and starved for attention or emotionless predators hungry for men's money or just plain annoying.

Italian-Americans - are simply brutish mobsters. The sharks in Shark Tale are the parody of Americans of Italian decent. Allow me to preface this by saying my view on the Italian-American Defamation League's problems with The Sopranos was an overreaction: "The Sopranos" never tried to characterize all Italian-Americans as gangsters, merely exploring that sect of Americans of Italian decent who happen to be mobsters and how they operate. Conversely, Shark Tale characterizes all sharks as mobsters (save Lenny, who is something of a pouf). Robert De Niro voices Don Lino and helps to perpetrate the stereotype of Italians as ruthless, family-loving mobsters who will terrorize those who they can hold any sort of power over, including their own assistants (characterized by an octopus in Shark Tale). The sharks solve their problems through asserting dominance and threats, respecting only strength and having a fiery temper.

Homosexuals - might be a bit of a stretch in Shark Tale, but Lenny (Jack Black) is played as an effeminate shark who disguises himself as a dolphin to leave the shark mob. The most obvious implication is that the pacifistic Lenny is somehow less of a man, a common stereotype about gays that the rabid homophobics never seem to spread when confronted with the athletic (and clearly masculine) sect of gays who place an emphasis on bodybuilding and fitness. Lenny is a caricature with a faint lisp, enthusiasm for dressing up and also happens to be an unmanly vegetarian.

Jews - what is far less opaque is the stereotype of Jews in Shark Tale. Since well before the time of Shakespeare, Jews have been characterized as the business-people, the money lenders, the people who are good with money and seem to have the financial advantage over everyone else. Martin Scorsese plays the pufferfish Sykes who is both an agent and a money lender. He is the common link between Don Lino and Oscar, the middleman between the Reef and the Mob. Which, if we've learned anything from the ethnic stereotypes in Shark Tale is appropriate. After all, who better to deal with the money of two vastly disparate groups as Blacks and Italians than a Jew?

And the final nail in the ethnic culture might well be Sykes' assistants. Two Rastafarian jellyfish who act as muscle for the Jewish accountant. Well, at least Shark Tale was smart enough to avoid any allegations of promoting hate crimes. After all, if a little urban fish is assaulted by Jamaican Immigrant jellyfish, it's not really a hate crime. It's "those people" doing it to themselves. And popular culture seems to have little problem with depictions of black on black crime, er, make that "urban on urban violence."

Shame on Shark Tale and those involved with it for their lack of foresight and transparent poor depictions of so many different ethnicities. For some of us, positive relations between all peoples - regardless of color, gender, sexuality or country of origin - is more than some fish story.

For other animated Dreamworks films, be sure to check out my reviews of:
Hoodwinked Too! Hood Vs. Evil
Shrek Forever After
Hoodwinked!
Shrek

1.5/10

For other movie reviews, please visit my index page by clicking here!

© 2012, 2007, 2004 W.L. Swarts. May not be reprinted without permission.
| | |

Saturday, August 13, 2011

Monsters Vs. Aliens: Near Miss On Perfection!




The Good: Funny, Wonderful animation, Amazing in 3-D, Likable characters, Interesting plot concept, Good execution.
The Bad: Slightly predictable, Lost something on DVD (scale issues)
The Basics: Funny and impressive in 3-D, Monsters Vs. Aliens is the winner many of us did not expect from Dreamworks!


For those who do not read many of my reviews, it is worth noting that it is a very rare thing that I dole out 10/10 ratings. To get a 10/10 rating in my pantheon, something has to be perfect. Some of the ones that have gotten just below have been close enough that I used a coin to determine which way the rating went. Monsters Vs. Aliens was one such film and having just seen it again with my wife, the bottomline on it is that this film is a solid 9, looks amazing on the big screen and it almost guaranteed fun for anyone who loves movies. But, it is not perfect and on DVD, it loses something.

Traditionally, I have not been as excited about Dreamworks animation productions. While many lauded Shrek, I found it to be essentially a one-joke film and was not on that bandwagon. When it came to A Shark Tale, I was excited about it and left the film literally slackjawed from the racist and classist tinge of the film. So, my fear for Monsters Vs. Aliens was that it would be a one-joke film geared toward children. It was not; in fact, my fiance and I laughed more than the lone kid at the showing we went to!

On the day she is to be married to a self-centered weatherman, Susan Murphy is hit by a meteor of quantonium, which causes her to grow to an incredible height and becomes the target of an elite government agency in charge of protecting the world from monsters. Susan wakes up in a pentagon facility run by W.R. Monger, who introduces her to the other captured monsters: B.O.B. (actually pronounced "Bob") an amorphous blob of blue goo, Dr. Cockroach (it's exactly as he sounds, a mad scientist trapped in the body of a giant cockroach), The Missing Link (a reptile or amphibian of great strength), and Insectasaurus, a massive furry insect. Susan is renamed Ginormica and prepares for a life trapped in the government facility.

But soon, the United States finds itself under siege by an immense robot probe sent from Gallaxhar, a power-hungry alien who is attempting to make himself invincible by harnessing all of the quantonium in the galaxy. When the President of the United States fails to overwhelm the probe, Monger sends out the monsters to stop the probe and by banding together with their various strengths, Ginormica, B.O.B., Dr. Cockroach, The Missing Link, and Insectasaurus work to save San Francisco and the world. But their first victory only draws Gallaxhar to Earth and offers further danger for everyone!

It ought to be stressed right up front that Monsters Vs. Aliens is fun and far smarter than I would have anticipated. First, it is hilarious, making science fiction allusions across the board from Star Trek to Close Encounters Of The Third Kind and many others that will no doubt keep geeks (like me) rewatching the film multiple times. Many of the best jokes, though, are geared toward seasoned geeks and adults - not children - like when The Missing Link finds himself topside for the first time in decades and notes that it is hotter and it would be "a convenient truth" if someone would have told him. While there were a huge number (I would estimate at least half) of the best jokes used in the various preview trailers for Monsters Vs. Aliens, there were enough laugh-out-loud funny jokes in the film to sustain viewers outside the already known jokes.

Second, ultimately the reason I let the rating - nines are between fours and fives anyway - come down to a cointoss and let that fall where it did was because seeing Monsters Vs. Aliens in 3-D was absolutely incredible. Dreamworks animation did some truly impressive work where three-dimensional shots were then expanded on by adding elements in a deep foreground which were quite extraordinary. When I consider films, spectacle rates very low on my list. Still, the effects in Monsters Vs. Aliens are quite impressive. How will they look on a smaller screen? How will they look in less than 3-D? Nowhere near as impressive, this I could tell already.

The reason spectacle usually scores so low for me is that spectacle is the icing on a film's substance and while great films may be enhanced by decent special effects or dragged down by crummy ones, it is impossible to make a perfect film where all one has going for it is effect. Character, plot and acting make up the substance of a story and form the foundations of great works. Spectacle only garnishes them. To that end, Monsters Vs. Aliens looks good, but it has a strong foundation as well. The plot is relatively original and it is laced with enough humor to mitigate the minor predictable elements (though the scene in the middle of the closing credits certainly takes a turn for the unpredictable!) and not make the viewer ask the essential question of "why can't nuclear arms be used against the alien probe?"

As for the characters, they were far more likable and developed than I would have predicted given the previews. For example, Susan keeps a thread of interest running throughout the film so strong that B.O.B. begins to believe he is dating Derek as well! Susan is transformed into Ginormica, but does not lose her humanity or backstory, which is something that happens in far too many of this type science fiction or superhero story. And character development is usually absent in comedies, but Monsters Vs. Aliens has it, albeit a bit predictable.

Even the supplemental characters of The Missing Link and W.R. Monger have some sense of backstory and character to them. Link is a bit out of shape and W.R. Monger has been kept from the President's inner circle. So, their journey takes them along arcs of redemption (of a sort) and promotion.

The voices in Monsters Vs. Aliens are well-chosen as expressive and/or recognizable. Seth Rogen continues his streak of comic brilliance as the voice of B.O.B. and Hugh Laurie is likely to impress American audiences with his vocal diversity as Dr. Cockroach. Reese Witherspoon holds her own as the lead, as she plays Susan and Ginormica. She uses her voice wonderfully to emote and express her character's emotions in compelling ways deeper than the animations. Even Rainn Wilson and Kiefer Sutherland give vocally diverse performances that are unexpected. Stephen Colbert, of course, hams it up as the President and fills the niche perfectly.

All in all, Monsters Vs. Aliens made it on my "Best Of 2009" movie list as it was consistently funny, amazingly animated and was far smarter than many of its Dreamworks Animated predecessors. See it in 3-D (or IMAX 3-D!) if at all possible!

For other animated films, please be sure to check out my takes on:
Planet 51
Despicable Me
Shrek

9/10

For other film reviews, please be sure to visit my index page on the subject by clicking here!

© 2011, 2009 W.L. Swarts. May not be reprinted without permission.

| | |