Showing posts with label Peter Howitt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Peter Howitt. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 13, 2016

A Worthwhile Technique Is Introduced With Sliding Doors, An Otherwise Average Film!


The Good: Well-paced, Good concept that is executed well, The two lead actors.
The Bad: Mood, John Lynch's attempt at romantic chemistry, One character is used entirely for plot exposition.
The Basics: Sliding Doors is a moody, surprisingly charmless drama that explores the effect of a single moment on a woman's life and the ripple effect it has in her personal and professional lives.


Every now and then, there is a premise that becomes so well-known and referenced that the general population gets the idea whether or not they have seen the source material for that premise. I have found myself referencing Sliding Doors - the Frasier episode "Sliding Frasiers" was based upon the same device, as was (essentially) the Doctor Who episode "Turn Left" (reviewed here!) - that it almost escaped my notice that I had never before seen the film Sliding Doors!

Sliding Doors utilizes a fairly simple plot device to explore the idea that a single moment can change the direction of one's life. Writer and director Peter Howitt makes the moment a very literal one; catching a train in London. From the point at which the protagonist of Sliding Doors gets through the sliding doors of a subway - or not - her story, day, and life take very divergent directions.

Helen is rushing on her way to work Monday morning, where she is fired for taking vodka from work the prior Friday. Leaving the advertising agency at which she works, she goes to the subway, rushing to catch the next one. In one reality, she has to avoid a little girl, which causes het to be stuck outside the train; in another, the girl's mother pulls her close and Helen is able to continue her mad dash to the subway and she makes it into the car. The abandoned Helen learns from the public address system that there has been an accident and there will be no more subways coming. So, Helen goes up to the surface where she is mugged trying to get a taxi. On the subway, Helen sits and ignores the man sitting next to her, James, who is trying to talk her up. That Helen is charmed by James and arrives back in the flat she shares with Gerry to catch him having an affair with Lydia.

The other Helen tries calling Gerry from the hospital, but when he does not answer, she takes a cab home. The difference in time is long enough for Gerry to be done sleeping with Lydia for her to be gone and Gerry to be in the shower when Helen arrives home. Gerry sloppily tries to clean up from his affair and fakes caring for Helen, while in the alternate reality, Helen is despondent. Helen goes out and gets drunk while Gerry tries to track her down, with James arriving at the bar she is at and she tells him just how rotten her day became after they parted ways. In the other reality, Gerry and Helen go to the same bar and get shitfaced drunk, ignoring James and his friend Clive. The next morning, both Helens wake up and are nursed through their hangovers by Gerry and (in the reality where she made the train) her best friend Anna. Anna takes Helen in and gives her a makeover and she mopes for nine days in her friend's care. In the other reality, Helen rushes out and gets part time work to take care of Gerry while he does not write the novel he claims to be working on. One date night, Helen calls Gerry on the presence of two brandy glasses in the bedroom the day she got mugged. As Gerry's relationships with Helen and Lydia fall apart in one reality, Helen gets a new lease on life in the other through her friendship with James and her new determination to start her own business.

Sliding Doors has an impressive cast led by Gwyneth Paltrow, who plays Helen. Paltrow manages to play the role of Helen credibly in both realities by making Helen not overly happy in either reality. Paltrow is able to play giddy drunk for moments, but the bulk of her performance is serious and sad. Paltrow helps to create a mood that is largely consistent throughout the narrative and it helps illustrate that even though a minor incident may change one's life, a single incident does not change one's entire personality.

Paltrow plays off John Hannah as James and John Lynch as Gerry. Hannah is very intelligent and able to make James articulate and plausibly charming. He and Paltrow play off one another very well as a result of excellent on-screen chemistry. Lynch and Paltrow have so little chemistry that the relationship between Helen and Gerry never seems plausible. Lynch and Jeanne Tripplehorn have so little on-screen chemistry that they, too, seem entirely implausible as a viable romantic couple. Tripplehorn makes good use of her minimal time on screen to steal her scenes. Tripplehorn takes a comparatively minor supporting role and makes Lydia seem deeper than just a mistress.

Sliding Doors is well-directed by writer Peter Howlitt and it is hard to say that the film is predictable because I've seen so very many works that are derivative of it. What is poorly presented is the character of Russell, who is Gerry's friend. Actually, what Russell is is a tool for exposition that moves portions of Gerry's story along without having to show it. His character might be a necessary evil in order to give some depth to Gerry outside his relationship, but functionally Russell is a tool.

Ultimately, Sliding Doors does what it sets out to do by illustrating the effects of a single moment on a life and it does it well-enough to be entertaining and worth adapting the technique for other works, even if it is not truly exceptional in its own right.

For other works featuring Gwyneth Paltrow, please visit my reviews of:
Iron Man 3
The Avengers
Contagion
Glee: The 3-D Concert Movie
Glee - Season Two, Volume 1
Iron Man 2
Iron Man
Running With Scissors
Sky Captain And The World Of Tomorrow
Shallow Hal
The Royal Tenenbaums
Bounce
Shakespeare In Love
Hard Eight
Malice
Hook

6/10

For other movie reviews, please check out my Film Review Index Page for an organized listing!

© 2016 W.L. Swarts. May not be reprinted without permission.
| | |

Saturday, October 20, 2012

Everything You Would Expect From A Romantic Comedy. Except Humor. Or Real Romance.


The Good: I suppose the acting; I had not seen Bronson or Moore as lawyers before...
The Bad: Ghastly predictable plot, No genuine character development, Not funny, Not romantic.
The Basics: Tired, predictable and pathetic, Laws Of Attraction offers the viewer nothing genuinely new.


There should be a new word coined to describe a movie whose trailer not only presents the best moments of a movie, but offers a condensed version of the entire film, including scenes at or near the end. Also, people who make movie posters that reveal climactic moments of a film, they should be fired (I'm looking at YOU, people who made the DVD cover to The Notebook!, reviewed here!). I recall seeing a preview of Laws Of Attraction in the theaters, thinking that looked alshone (I'm trying coining now, that's how desperate I am to get this review up to a respectable length!), I don't truly need to see it. Well, the library was closing early today for the holiday and it came down to Laws Of Attraction and the Ashton Kutcher movie Guess Who, so I grabbed this because I have a respect for Julianne Moore and Pierce Brosnan.

I respect them both a little less now.

Audrey Woods is a successful divorce lawyer who has never lost a case. She is working along in court when one day Daniel Rafferty pops up as opposing counsel. He, too, has never lost a case and his disheveled appearance causes Audrey to be caught off guard when he turns out to be an amazing lawyer. Soon, they are going head to hear in every major divorce in New York City. As they work the divorce of a rock star and fashion designer, Audrey and Daniel supposedly fall in love and accidentally get married.

Of course, if you've seen the alshone preview, you know how it ends, in fact, there are no real surprises. If you haven't seen the trailer, you can probably figure the movie out based upon the plot summary I wrote above. Being completely predictable is one of this film's chief faults. This film offers nothing in the way of surprises, even for those who have not seen any footage from it.

Sadly, for two respectable actors like Pierce Brosnan and Julianne Moore, the movie continues to suffer either from execution or idea. If it suffers from execution, it is about a romance with alcohol. All of the important events between Daniel and Audrey occur when they are under the influence of alcohol. They make love for the first time and get married both while falling-down drunk. In fact, the only time Audrey seems romantically interested in Daniel is when she is completely wasted. I mean, completely.

If the movie suffers from idea, then it fails because Audrey and Daniel are never genuinely romantic with one another. To hold Laws Of Attraction up as a love story is pretty scary when one looks at it objectively. Two people get drunk, have sex, get drunk again and get married and while that seems fine with Daniel, it's clearly a huge trauma for Audrey. That's not truly romantic no matter what stripe someone is.

So, an especially jaded - but less biased by concept than actuality - interpretation of Laws Of Attraction would be that this is the most successful film about a sexually predatory man to come down the pike in a long time. After all, when they are sober, Daniel is determined, manipulative and goal-oriented. When Audrey is drunk, he achieves all of his goals. You don't get much more predatory than the whole "get a woman drunk to shag her" thing. And yet, it is Daniel who gets everything he wants in this movie while Audrey is mostly just subjected to the machinations that work against her.

The thing that people might want to cling to, then, is the end. They might cry out "Audrey really loves Daniel!" Well, that's true. All of a sudden, Audrey is used to Daniel and literally over the course of a scene decides she loves him. The problem here is completely in suspension of disbelief. I can believe opposing counsel falling in love, I can buy the whole hate hate hate hate love thing, but here it's just a hyperbole. Audrey has lived her life with certain goals that she has wanted and suddenly, in a moment of epiphany she gives them all up. Maybe I'd buy it more if she wasn't a divorce lawyer. After all, with her extensive career as a divorce lawyer, in addition to her recent experiences of apparently making bad decisions while drunk, no one would seem to know the consequences of not thinking through a decision better than her. But then she just makes the leap.

The audience does not.

All that keeps the movie bearable - not even watchable - is the acting. While Audrey and Daniel are inconsistent, poorly-written characters, Julianne Moore and Pierce Brosnan do the best with what is written on the page. As a result, they do their best to play along with what is written and the film works when it is establishing their characters.

Moore, especially, is completely convincing as Audrey as a strong, professional woman. She has the bearing of a woman who is in charge, has worked hard to get where she is and who has a mindset for success. Moore plays her well as a strong woman and so when Audrey has to get angry for sleeping with Daniel and later for getting drunk and marrying him, she plays that with appropriate fury and frustration. Moore's performance is so good that it makes the viewer wonder why Audrey has anything to do with Daniel outside court after the first time they have sex and better yet, why she blindly drinks with him.

Bronsan is fine as Daniel, though the character he plays is the predictable disheveled genius. In fact, Laws Of Attraction makes me wish that Hollywood would stop producing more "Odd Couple" comedies. We get it, "opposites attract!" We're not dumb, we've seen it so many times, we get it. Bronsan does his part fine oscillating between unkempt and beautifully Brosnan.

It's a shame that they give such competent performances in such an otherwise terrible movie. Save yourself the time and just watch the alshone preview trailer; everything is in it.

For other works with Parker Posey, be sure to check out my reviews of:
Boston Legal
Superman Returns
Blade: Trinity
Best In Show

3/10

For other film reviews, please check out my Movie Review Index Page for an organized listing!

© 2012, 2007 W.L. Swarts. May not be reprinted without permission.
| | |