Showing posts with label Ernest Hemingway. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ernest Hemingway. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

The Impossible Fishing Yarn: The Old Man And The Sea Is Overhyped Hemingway!



The Good: A single theme, it's short enough, I guess.
The Bad: Flat characters, unimaginative narration, outright boring plot
The Basics: Despite winning Hemingway the Nobel Prize, The Old Man And The Sea should be the bottom of your Hemingway reading list.


Allow me to open my review by revealing that I am a fan of Hemingway's writing. I like Faulkner's works better, but I like Hemingway. Actually, I love literature that is considered Modernist (1914 - 1945). Some of the best works of American and European literature were written in that period and if I were ever given a chance to live out my life in the past, the liberal sensibilities of the '30s strikes me as my ideal time period. I would have flourished. I, for example, enthusiastically recommend A Moveable Feast (click here for that review!).

At his best, Hemingway's minimalist approach is enhanced by his belief in "the Iceberg Principle" and he loads his limited verbiage up with double meanings and insinuations and makes the reader dig for what's below the surface. By the time the reader gets to The Old Man And The Sea, they're sick of digging and he's sick of packing it all under the surface. It's a common theory that Hemingway's winning the Nobel prize for The Old Man And The Sea was more an acknowledgment of his lifetime body of works than this novel. I tend to believe that. It's worth noting that while Hemingway had been a powerhouse in the literature community during the modernist period, by the time he got around to The Old Man And The Sea, in 1952, he was less known for his writing and more as a celebrity. The closest equivalent now would be someone like, say, J.K. Rowling; she's not a terribly great writer or anything, but tabloids, etc. are happy she's around to put a story in the news from time to time. Man it's a sad world we've become. And it's a sad place Hemingway was writing from when he wrote this novel.

Outside the simplistic, unimaginative story of a boy and his older fishing companion trying to catch a marlin or sunfish or whatever it was, there's not real plot to the book and the characters are hardly interesting. They barely say anything and when they do it's not worthy of actually reading. To be more specific, The Old Man And The Sea tells the story of Santiago, a Cuban fisherman who is down on his luck, who is aided by a boy named Manolin in his day to day activities. Santiago goes out further than he ever has to try to fish and actually catch something and he does. Unfortunately, it's a huge marlin and it takes him and his skiff on a ride for days and after being dragged around for days . . . he ends up with nothing.

It's no big surprise; it's Hemingway in his late period. Hemingway is past his prime and he is feeling it in this work. Gone is the magic of language and the depth that may be revealed through the minimal use of words and directions. Santiago is tired and it comes across clearly in Hemingway being too tired to write him well. Many people compare The Old Man And The Sea to Moby Dick. The reason any version of Moby Dick will always be better than The Old Man And The Sea is because there is passion in the whale story. Ahab is a passionate man and he makes the story come alive through his obsession. There are no emotions powerful enough to sustain our interest in The Old Man And The Sea.

There is one silver lining in this droll literary failure and that is Hemingway makes an explicit thesis which is interesting and debatable: "A man may be beaten but not defeated." It's an interesting idea and one that bares sitting around with your learned colleagues and arguing about. Unfortunately, this novel doesn't offer a truly good grounds for the theme. That is, outside of it being explicitly stated, the idea never seems so immediate in this book. Indeed, Hemingway is writing from a stance of being defeated, not just beaten. "Beaten but not defeated" implies some spark of life that cannot be extinguished from the human animal, but it is absent from this work.

The Old Man And The Sea is the old man with paper attempting to churn out one more decent novel and failing. It's sad too; more than the character in the novel, the reader comes to pity Hemingway as an artist who stayed after his time.

For other classic novels, please check out my reviews of:
Long Day's Journey Into Night - Eugene O'Neill
The Sound And The Fury - William Faulkner
The Complete Works Of William Shakespeare

3/10

For other book reviews, please be sure to check out my index page for an organized listing. That list, updated daily, is available by clicking here!

© 2010, 2004 W.L. Swarts. May not be reprinted without permission.


| | |

Friday, November 5, 2010

Moving A Feast Of Greatness: A Moveable Feast By Ernest Hemingway Succeeds!




The Good: Quick, excellent dialog, funny
The Bad: Simple, especially in writing style
The Basics: One of Hemingway's best, A Moveable Feast is a fun, quick read!


It ought to be noted that my Hemingway bias is toward his earlier works: A Farewell to Arms has always been one of my favorites and I've never been able to stomach The Old Man and the Sea. A Moveable Feast was a very pleasant surprise in that it was one of Hemingway's later books and it's extraordinary. In addition to being a lazy afternoon's worth of reading, the memoir (novel? It's never made terribly clear how truly autobiographical this work is) is funny and often witty.

Basically, the book is about a young Ernest Hemingway living in Paris as an expatriate writer early in his career. In France, Hemingway meets numerous other artists: Gertrude Stein, Ford Maddox Ford and F. Scott Fitzgerald, among the most notable. With him is his wife, Hadley, who fulfills an almost Sancho Panza role in the novel - her occasional interjections in the novel are often biting and funny (a perfect example is acknowledging how Gertrude Stein ignores her at the end of one chapter). In the end, Hemingway's attempts to write his new work and negotiate with all of the people in his life are complicated by his feelings of ambivalence.

But, basically, all A Moveable Feast is is a collection of important art celebrities in the early part of the last century living in France. It's a lot of name-dropping and more intimate conversations that we're lucky to be privy to. Or at least we get to see Hemingway's take on them. His views on Gertrude Stein and Ford Maddox Ford are insightful and not a part of either of their works.

There's not much to A Moveable Feast, so if you've ever been turned off by Hemingway, this is a very reader-friendly way back into his world. The book is charming and it's impossible for me to not mention how hard I laughed over the scenes where Hemingway is giving Fitzgerald advice on lovemaking. It's classic. Fitzgerald, throughout the book, is characterized as nervous and completely dominated by his wife and her hypochondria. Hemingway has a lot of advice for him.

Basically, this is Hemingway with a sense of humor and a surprising amount of historical importance; he knew the time and place he was was significant and he captured it expertly in this book. It's a place that's very easy to discover through this novel, especially if you didn't live through it.

This is the work where it is evident that Hemingway can write realistically. His level of vocabulary and diction is more impressive than most of his later works and he has many memorable lines here. The candor with which he exposes each of his contacts in Paris is exquisite and the level of detail is high and interesting. It's worth the attention of anyone who likes a decent historical novel.

For other Modernist works, please check out my reviews of:
The Sound And The Fury - William Faulkner
The Fountainhead - Ayn Rand
Invisible Man - Ralph Ellison

7.5/10

For other book reviews, please visit my index page by clicking here!

© 2010, 2003 W.L. Swarts. May not be reprinted without permission.


| | |